I recently read an article <\/a>about the latest evidence supporting panpsychism<\/a>, the theory that the entire world is conscious. The findings were from a study of dissociative (multiple) personalities. I was also re-reading Jung and found this sentence: “But even the soberest formulation of the phenomenology of complexes cannot get round the impressive fact of their autonomy, and the deeper one penetrates into their nature \u2013 I might almost say into their biology<\/u><\/strong> \u2013 the more clearly do they reveal their character as splinter psyches<\/em>.<\/u><\/strong>” <\/p>\n\n\n\n So, the biology of what creates our psyches (the brain, etc.) is inclined to produce many different psyches. A while ago I saw a video of Thomas Moore<\/a>, a “creation theologian.” In it, he noted that the only thing we know about consciousness is that living things have it. But we know living things are carbon-based. So by the transitive property<\/a>, how do we know it is not carbon that thinks? ![\"\"](\"https:\/\/hopperguy.com\/Jung\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/multiple_personalities_within_by_perkunija_d71nbtr-pre.jpg\")
If you read the article linked above on the word “article,” you will see that the scientists proposed the theory that each of us (and literally everything) is a separate personality of the universal consciousness. <\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/hopperguy.com\/Jung\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/rocks-with-eyes.jpg\")
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t