I was asked recently to help an author with a review of questionnaires specific to a particular body part. The writing was just beginning, and I realized in this stage it looks like a list. But that helped clarify the purpose of such a review.
Anyone can find what questionnaires have been used for any particular situation. But the author of a review is offering to help the reader choose which one to use. This is done by synthesizing the literature, not merely listing. This leaves two possible audiences for such a review: clinical or research.
A clinician is going to want to know whether a certain questionnaire is appropriate for their clinical practice. They will want to know more about the development of the questionnaire. Was it developed to be used in a population like they see in their practice? Has it been used in such a population? What was the effectiveness?
A researcher is going to want to know more about the application of the questionnaire. In what types of research studies was each questionnaire used? What was the population? Setting? Study design? They want to know whether a particular questionnaire will be valid and reliable in their study.
Knowing what your audience wants is half of the battle in any communication. The way to proceed with a review is dictated by the audience for whom you are writing.